Puberty and Procedure of Khula in Pakistan: 

Unwilling person could not be legally compelled to undergo a medical examination. At the most, an adverse inference could be drawn on account of such unwillingness. The Khula Procedure in Pakistan & procedure of Khula in Pakistan is very simple and easy. Here u need to Know The Khula Pakistani Law * Khula Pakistan family Law. The concept of compromise was also taken into consideration. As mandated by Allah Almighty, the concept of compromise in matrimonial solutions is to be read in Ss. 10 & 12 of Act. Failure of pre-trial conciliation effort and passing of the decree by Family Court subject to the return of Rs.500 and 5 tolas gold ornaments paid to the plaintiff as dower. Law case for dissolution of marriage on the ground of khula was decreed, and divorce in Pakistan was finalized. Failure of pre-trial conciliation effort and passing of the decree of divorce in Pakistan by Family Court subject to the return of Rs.500 and 5 tolas gold ornaments paid to the plaintiff as dower.

Nikahnama:

Entry in Nikahnama showing payment of such dower to plaintiff at the time of her marriage had not been challenged by her before any competent forum. Family Court under S. 10(4) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 was bouned. At pass decree upon restoration of dower to the husband. Family Court, therefore, had passed decree strictly under the law. Plaintiff had filed a Constitutional petition after a lapse. Of her of four years, thus, she was guilty of contumacious lethargy, inaction, enforcement of Constitutional petition for being devoid of merits and suffering from laches. 3.

Counsel:

Presence of counsel for parties-Such presence neither proceeding in the presence of counsel for parties. The court does not require such presence. Family Court had exclusive jurisdiction to decide how and how such proceedings should be conducted. The appearance of wife in such proceedings was not required. Provision of S. 10(3) of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964 for being neither directory neither required personal appearance of wife nor such appearance was mandatory. The court under gross negligence in High Court neither dismissed laxity and her right of conciliation nor required. Necessary Personal Pre-trial conciliation proceedings.18 of the Act could dispense 'with the legal requirement of the personal appearance of Pardanashin lady and allow her to be represented in such proceedings through her authorized agent.

Family Court:

Wife having appeared before Family Court once or twice, would not be disentitled to avail legal right provided under S. 18 of West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, for all times to come. 5. Reconciliation between the spouses. The petition was directed against notice received by the petitioner/wife from Chairman Union Council informing her about the notice of the divorce in Pakistan served by her husband and offering reconciliation proceedings under the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961. Both the petitioner/wife and husband were residing abroad. For foreign resident Pakistanis, the law had created a remedy and forum for reconciliation between the spouses under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961 in the Pakistan Mission in the countries of their residence. The husband should avail that remedy, and if such remedy was not available, then any other competent forum could be approached for relief.